Monday, March 12, 2007

Dedication

On Sunday we dedicated Samuel to the Lord in the presence of family and friends. It was a good time. We had about 20 people over to the house afterward for some soup and sandwiches.
Samuel was the star of the show. Oh yeah, and in case you're wondering, Samuel is wearing a gown, not a dress. (Gowns are not just for girls as demonstrated by the thousands of male university graduates who also wear gowns during their graduation ceremonies.)


My parents are dog-sitting for some friends and Stephen loves to play with Sugar.

7 comments:

Randy said...

"Stephen loves to play with Sugar."

I love to eat sugar. Preferably in the form of candy, but I'll eat it plain if necessary.

John den Boer said...

Is that a dress he's wearing? Dresses are for girls.

Karen said...

Congratulations on Samuel's baby dedication! I'm wondering if any of Samuel's parents or aunts/uncles wore the gown (many) years ago.
Karen

Jono and Janice said...

Randy, while sugar does taste good, you should be careful about how much you eat. Many nutritionists claim that it is very unhealthy. *
John, the cloth that adorned Samuel's body during the ceremony of his dedication as seen in the picture is known as a "gown" and can be worn by both genders of the human race. The wearing of a gown does not necessarily carry any connotation about the gender of the wearer.
Karen, the gown was worn by all the children in Samuel's mother's family (Janice and her siblings). The gown was fashioned from Samuel's grandmother's wedding gown.
(Note the use of the word "gown". It was used intentionally to draw attention to the fact that certain gowns should only be worn by members of the female gender.)**
Footnotes:
* I have no actual support for this claim.
** This may not be a universally accepted statement, but I hope most people who view this blog will agree.

Anonymous said...

I think the determination as to whether Samuel was wearing a dress (only for girls) or a gown (unisex) has to do with the accessories. If in fact Samuel had been wearing high heels and been carrying a purse (the photos do not show any) he would indeed have been wearing a dress. However, since Samuel was likely recieving some sort of piece of paper for his dedication (much like a diploma) then he was definately wearing a gown.

I just thought I would add my 2 cents worth....but I want change.

Cheers
Tom Newman

Jono and Janice said...

Very good, Mr. Newman. But you'll have to come here if you want your change. I'm not driving up there to give it to you.

John den Boer said...

Why does the gown have so many frills? Frills are for girls.